FTIHX vs. FXNAX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FTIHX (Fidelity Total International Index Fund) and FXNAX (Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FTIHX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index, while FXNAX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTIHX returned 8.11%/yr vs -0.02%/yr for FXNAX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTIHX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FXNAX.

Performance

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIHX achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.50% return.

FTIHX

• 1D: 3.27%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 12.99%
• 6M: 14.98%
• 1Y: 27.51%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 8.11%
• 10Y*: —

FXNAX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	12.99%	32.59%	4.98%	15.49%	-16.29%	8.45%	11.09%	21.50%	-14.40%	25.88%
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund	0.50%	7.14%	1.35%	5.82%	-13.55%	-2.10%	7.63%	8.50%	0.04%	3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIHX and FXNAX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016	0.06

Over the past year, FTIHX and FXNAX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FTIHX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIHX

FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FXNAX

FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTIHX	FXNAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.27	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.93	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.23	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	1.69	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	4.97	+4.73

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIHX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIHX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, which is greater than FXNAX's maximum drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIHX and FXNAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTIHX	FXNAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.75%	-19.51%	-16.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.25%	-2.94%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-6.16%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.99%	-18.54%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-2.79%	+0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.20%	-3.86%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.00%	+1.91%

Volatility

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) at 1.41%. This indicates that FTIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTIHX	FXNAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	1.41%	+5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.16%	2.87%	+10.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.23%	3.93%	+11.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	6.08%	+9.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.11%	5.01%	+11.10%

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIHX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FTIHX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than FXNAX's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	2.46%	2.78%	2.88%	2.78%	2.51%	2.55%	1.62%	2.61%	2.21%	0.45%	0.47%	0.00%
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund	3.70%	3.58%	3.40%	3.15%	1.81%	1.74%	2.92%	2.68%	2.74%	2.57%	2.76%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTIHX and FXNAX in my portfolio?

FTIHX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTIHX or FXNAX?

FTIHX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to FXNAX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIHX dropped -35.75% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.