PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIHX vs. CDDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIHX achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly higher than CDDYX's 10.02% return.


FTIHX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.09%
YTD
13.68%
6M
15.21%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

CDDYX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.10%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.34%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
13.68%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
10.02%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIHX and CDDYX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.70

The correlation between FTIHX and CDDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIHX vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIHXCDDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.89

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

14.68

-4.92

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIHX and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIHX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIHX and CDDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIHXCDDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-32.74%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-5.51%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-12.99%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.99%

-16.91%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

-32.74%

-3.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-2.76%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.46%

+1.45%

Volatility

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.78%. This indicates that FTIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIHXCDDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

2.78%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

6.93%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

9.21%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

13.29%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.69%

+0.42%

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIHX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTIHX vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

FTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than CDDYX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.89%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.45%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTIHX and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to CDDYX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIHX dropped -35.75% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIHX and CDDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer