PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIF vs. BSMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIF vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.30% return.


FTIF

1D
0.65%
1M
0.40%
YTD
25.81%
6M
24.44%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*

BSMW

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIF vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
25.81%7.79%0.50%12.52%
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
1.30%3.42%-0.35%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIF and BSMW is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between FTIF and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTIF vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTIF
BSMW

Energy

44.1%

-

Basic Materials

20.1%

-

Industrials

16.5%

-

Real Estate

12.1%

-

Technology

4.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.7%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

FTIF
44.1%
BSMW

-

Basic Materials

FTIF
20.1%
BSMW

-

Industrials

FTIF
16.5%
BSMW

-

Real Estate

FTIF
12.1%
BSMW

-

Technology

FTIF
4.1%
BSMW
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTIF
3.2%
BSMW
0.3%

Communication Services

FTIF

-

BSMW

-

Consumer Defensive

FTIF

-

BSMW

-

Financial Services

FTIF

-

BSMW
1.7%

Healthcare

FTIF

-

BSMW

-

Utilities

FTIF

-

BSMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIF vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMW
BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIF vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTIFBSMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.79

2.39

+4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.14

7.53

+12.60

FTIF vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIF Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIF and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTIFBSMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.48

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.69

+0.06

Drawdowns

FTIF vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and BSMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIFBSMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-7.57%

-20.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.46%

-2.92%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

-7.34%

-20.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.98%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-1.72%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

0.92%

+0.92%

Volatility

FTIF vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.93%. This indicates that FTIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIFBSMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

0.93%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

1.98%

+8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

2.82%

+12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

5.00%

+13.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

5.00%

+13.96%

FTIF vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTIF vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
3.20%3.24%3.48%2.36%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.11%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTIF and BSMW have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

On 3-year performance, FTIF leads with 16.19% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 16.19% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.11% for FTIF.

FTIF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTIF and 0.18% for BSMW.

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIF and BSMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer