FTIF vs. BSMW
FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTIF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTIF returned 16.19%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FTIF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
FTIF vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.30% return.
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 25.81%
- 6M
- 24.44%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTIF vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 25.81% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.52% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.30% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTIF and BSMW is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between FTIF and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTIF vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTIF
BSMW
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
FTIF
BSMW
-
Basic Materials
FTIF
BSMW
-
Industrials
FTIF
BSMW
-
Real Estate
FTIF
BSMW
-
Technology
FTIF
BSMW
Consumer Cyclical
FTIF
BSMW
Communication Services
FTIF
-
BSMW
-
Consumer Defensive
FTIF
-
BSMW
-
Financial Services
FTIF
-
BSMW
Healthcare
FTIF
-
BSMW
-
Utilities
FTIF
-
BSMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTIF vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
FTIF
BSMW
FTIF vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTIF | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.79 | 2.39 | +4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.14 | 7.53 | +12.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTIF | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.69 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
FTIF vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTIF | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -7.57% | -20.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.46% | -2.92% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -7.34% | -20.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.98% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -1.72% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 0.92% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FTIF vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.93%. This indicates that FTIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTIF | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 0.93% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 1.98% | +8.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 2.82% | +12.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 5.00% | +13.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 5.00% | +13.96% |
FTIF vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTIF vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.11% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTIF and BSMW have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTIF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, FTIF leads with 16.19% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 16.19% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.11% for FTIF.
FTIF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTIF and 0.18% for BSMW.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTIF and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer