FTHMX vs. PFSLX
FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) and PFSLX (Paradigm Select Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, FTHMX returned 27.99% vs 81.72% for PFSLX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTHMX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for PFSLX.
Performance
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTHMX achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than PFSLX's 42.35% return.
FTHMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFSLX
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- YTD
- 42.35%
- 6M
- 41.43%
- 1Y
- 81.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 17.05%
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 14.83% | 12.89% | 12.48% | 11.60% |
PFSLX Paradigm Select Fund | 42.35% | 13.27% | 16.73% | 15.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTHMX and PFSLX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FTHMX and PFSLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTHMX vs. PFSLX — Risk / Return Rank
FTHMX
PFSLX
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) and Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTHMX | PFSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.54 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 7.85 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.43 | 30.84 | -14.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTHMX | PFSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 3.46 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.17 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTHMX drawdown since its inception was -20.45%, smaller than the maximum PFSLX drawdown of -91.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHMX and PFSLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTHMX | PFSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.45% | -91.83% | +71.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -10.91% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -91.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -82.77% | +82.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -13.72% | +10.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.77% | -0.97% |
Volatility
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) is 3.45%, while Paradigm Select Fund (PFSLX) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that FTHMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTHMX | PFSLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 8.44% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 19.31% | -9.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 24.76% | -12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 145.95% | -130.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 104.42% | -88.99% |
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTHMX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PFSLX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTHMX vs. PFSLX - Dividend Comparison
FTHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than PFSLX's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFSLX Paradigm Select Fund | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.17% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 2.93% | 3.89% | 0.74% | 9.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTHMX and PFSLX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFSLX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to FTHMX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHMX dropped -20.45% vs PFSLX's -91.83%.
PFSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTHMX and PFSLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer