FTHMX vs. FSLZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) and FSLZX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, FTHMX returned 27.99% vs 31.42% for FSLZX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTHMX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FSLZX.

Performance

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHMX achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than FSLZX's 18.79% return.

FTHMX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 6M: 14.83%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSLZX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: 18.79%
• 6M: 18.73%
• 1Y: 31.42%
• 3Y*: 16.88%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares	14.83%	12.89%	12.48%	11.60%
FSLZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z	18.79%	10.58%	9.00%	13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHMX and FSLZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.92

The correlation between FTHMX and FSLZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTHMX vs. FSLZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHMX

FTHMX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FTHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FTHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FTHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FTHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FTHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FSLZX

FSLZX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FSLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FSLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FSLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FSLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FSLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTHMX	FSLZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.06	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.91	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.36	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.69	3.81	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.43	14.21	+2.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FSLZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHMX and FSLZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTHMX	FSLZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.06	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.54	+0.77

Drawdowns

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHMX drawdown since its inception was -20.45%, smaller than the maximum FSLZX drawdown of -43.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHMX and FSLZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHMX	FSLZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.45%	-43.36%	+22.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-8.68%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-6.05%	+3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	2.32%	-0.52%

Volatility

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) is 3.45%, while Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that FTHMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTHMX	FSLZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	4.70%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.36%	12.26%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	16.08%	-3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.43%	20.02%	-4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.43%	21.48%	-6.05%

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHMX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLZX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTHMX vs. FSLZX - Dividend Comparison

FTHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than FSLZX's 6.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z	6.72%	7.99%	0.00%	0.91%	9.89%	12.98%	2.42%	4.32%	21.29%	4.12%
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares	0.29%	0.33%	0.28%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHMX and FSLZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FTHMX and FSLZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FTHMX or FSLZX?

FSLZX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FTHMX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHMX dropped -20.45% vs FSLZX's -43.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.