FSLZX vs. DSMFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSLZX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z) and DSMFX (Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FSLZX returned 8.85%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for DSMFX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSLZX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for DSMFX.

Performance

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLZX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than DSMFX's 15.86% return.

FSLZX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -2.12%
• 6M: 13.61%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 1Y: 27.67%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.37%

DSMFX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -3.21%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 15.86%
• 1Y: 32.51%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSLZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z	18.71%	10.58%	9.00%	17.32%	-13.77%	23.38%	13.20%	29.79%	-7.45%	11.47%
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	15.86%	13.94%	14.72%	11.61%	-19.89%	26.65%	23.63%	30.82%	-7.68%	12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLZX and DSMFX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017	0.93

The correlation between FSLZX and DSMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSLZX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSLZX

FSLZX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FSLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FSLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FSLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FSLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FSLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

DSMFX

DSMFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
DSMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DSMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DSMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DSMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DSMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSLZX	DSMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.66	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.38	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.28	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.16	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	11.18	-0.91

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the DSMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLZX and DSMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLZX drawdown since its inception was -43.36%, roughly equal to the maximum DSMFX drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLZX and DSMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLZX	DSMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.36%	-42.52%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-9.75%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.28%	-27.39%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	-30.72%	+5.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.60%	-5.80%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-8.66%	+2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.72%	-0.34%

Volatility

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z (FSLZX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLZX	DSMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.23%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	14.28%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	18.58%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	21.03%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.40%	21.82%	-0.42%

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLZX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLZX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison

FSLZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than DSMFX's 6.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	6.16%	7.13%	7.71%	0.26%	3.57%	27.39%	2.06%	4.05%	5.96%	0.92%
FSLZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class Z	6.73%	7.99%	0.00%	0.91%	9.89%	12.98%	2.42%	4.32%	21.29%	4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLZX and DSMFX in my portfolio?

FSLZX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLZX or DSMFX?

DSMFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FSLZX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLZX dropped -43.36% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.