PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHI vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHI vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHI achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.66% return.


FTHI

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
4.88%
6M
4.13%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
8.66%

XRMI

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.20%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHI vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FTHI
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
4.88%11.03%19.02%20.72%-4.37%3.15%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
1.66%4.60%15.18%4.22%-14.06%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHI and XRMI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021

0.70

The correlation between FTHI and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHI vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHI
FTHI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHI vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTHIXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.81

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

7.28

+4.81

FTHI vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHI and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTHI vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHI drawdown since its inception was -32.65%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHI and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHIXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.65%

-15.31%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-5.02%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-8.34%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.52%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-5.87%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.24%

+0.04%

Volatility

FTHI vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.71%. This indicates that FTHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHIXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.71%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

4.44%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

5.52%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

6.91%

+6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.29%

6.91%

+7.38%

FTHI vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHI vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

FTHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, less than XRMI's 12.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHI
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
8.72%8.70%8.61%8.50%9.06%4.37%4.76%4.21%4.76%4.00%4.41%4.98%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.73%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHI and XRMI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTHI has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHI dropped -32.65% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 3-year performance, FTHI leads with 14.28% vs 6.90% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FTHI has performed better with a 14.28% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FTHI.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.73%, compared with 8.72% for FTHI.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FTHI and 0.60% for XRMI.

FTHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHI and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer