FTHI vs. IPDP
FTHI (First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. FTHI charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
FTHI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTHI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTHI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 2.53% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
FTHI vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTHI
IPDP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
FTHI
IPDP
Industrials
FTHI
IPDP
Technology
FTHI
IPDP
Utilities
FTHI
IPDP
-
Healthcare
FTHI
IPDP
Consumer Cyclical
FTHI
IPDP
Consumer Defensive
FTHI
IPDP
Energy
FTHI
IPDP
-
Real Estate
FTHI
IPDP
-
Basic Materials
FTHI
IPDP
Communication Services
FTHI
IPDP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTHI vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank
FTHI
IPDP
FTHI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTHI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTHI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FTHI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTHI drawdown since its inception was -32.65%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHI and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTHI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | 0.00% | -32.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | 0.00% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility
FTHI vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTHI | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 0.00% | +8.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 0.00% | +13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 0.00% | +14.33% |
FTHI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTHI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTHI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
FTHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 8.73% | 8.70% | 8.61% | 8.50% | 9.06% | 4.37% | 4.76% | 4.21% | 4.76% | 4.00% | 4.41% | 4.98% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FTHI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTHI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
FTHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.73%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FTHI and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for FTHI and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer