FTHB vs. FCBD

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

FTHB (FIS Faith Income ETF) and FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTHB charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FCBD.

Performance

FTHB vs. FCBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FTHB

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FCBD

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.68%
• 6M: -0.08%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 1Y: 2.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	$31.37K	$61.90K	$91.60K
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF	$344.24K	$199.21K	$103.78K

FTHB vs. FCBD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF	1.66%
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHB and FCBD is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.81

Return for Risk

FTHB vs. FCBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCBD

FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 49
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHB vs. FCBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTHB	FCBD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.84	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.74	—

Drawdowns

FTHB vs. FCBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHB drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum FCBD drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHB and FCBD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHB	FCBD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-1.64%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-1.05%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-0.39%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTHB	FCBD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14%	2.33%	+1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.14%	2.57%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.14%	2.57%	+1.57%

FTHB vs. FCBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHB has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBD's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTHB vs. FCBD - Dividend Comparison

FTHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than FCBD's 4.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	4.18%	4.34%	0.08%
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHB and FCBD in my portfolio?

FTHB and FCBD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTHB or FCBD?

On fees, FTHB is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTHB or FCBD?

FTHB is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTHB or FCBD?

FCBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 1.01% for FTHB.

What is the main difference between FTHB and FCBD?

They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FTHB and 0.90% for FCBD.