FTHB vs. BBAG

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

FTHB (FIS Faith Income ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. FTHB is actively managed, while BBAG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTHB charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.

Performance

FTHB vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FTHB

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBAG

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: -0.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHB vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF	2.09%
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHB and BBAG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.89

Return for Risk

FTHB vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 32
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHB vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTHB	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.48	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.10	—

Drawdowns

FTHB vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHB drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHB and BBAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHB	BBAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-18.73%	+17.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-2.80%	+2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-6.18%	+5.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTHB	BBAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.25%	3.93%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.25%	5.94%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.25%	5.78%	-1.53%

FTHB vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHB has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTHB vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

FTHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BBAG's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.38%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHB and BBAG in my portfolio?

FTHB and BBAG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTHB or BBAG?

On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTHB or BBAG?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FTHB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTHB or BBAG?

BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.01% for FTHB.

What is the main difference between FTHB and BBAG?

They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FTHB and 0.03% for BBAG.