FTHB vs. EDGF
FTHB (FIS Faith Income ETF) and EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTHB charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for EDGF.
Performance
FTHB vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTHB
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGF
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTHB vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF | 2.09% |
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTHB and EDGF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTHB vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank
FTHB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDGF
FTHB vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTHB | EDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTHB vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTHB drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum EDGF drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHB and EDGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTHB | EDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -1.62% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.12% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.44% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
FTHB vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTHB | EDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 1.90% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 2.31% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 2.31% | +1.94% |
FTHB vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTHB has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTHB vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison
FTHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than EDGF's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.61% | 0.49% |
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTHB and EDGF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTHB is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTHB is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.
EDGF has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.01% for FTHB.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FTHB and 0.79% for EDGF.
Find the right allocation for FTHB and EDGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer