PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHB vs. BFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHB vs. BFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FTHB

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.66%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.26%
6M
0.24%
YTD
0.84%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHB vs. BFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTHB and BFIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHB vs. BFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BFIX
BFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHB vs. BFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTHBBFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

FTHB vs. BFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTHB vs. BFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHB drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum BFIX drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHB and BFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHBBFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-8.54%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.83%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-2.97%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

Volatility

FTHB vs. BFIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHBBFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.25%

2.84%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

4.74%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

4.74%

-0.49%

FTHB vs. BFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHB has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BFIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHB vs. BFIX - Dividend Comparison

FTHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BFIX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
3.58%3.73%4.38%4.30%1.58%
FTHB
FIS Faith Income ETF
1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHB and BFIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFIX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFIX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FTHB.

BFIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.01% for FTHB.

They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Build. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FTHB and 0.45% for BFIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHB and BFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer