FTGS vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTGS (First Trust Growth Strength ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FTGS is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

FTGS vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGS achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.

FTGS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 5.10%
• 1Y: 12.55%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 14.68%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 6M: 56.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGS vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF	5.22%	1.40%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	51.46%	25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGS and SGRT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

FTGS vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGS

FTGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
FTGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FTGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FTGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FTGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FTGS Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGS vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTGS	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTGS	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	3.81	-2.71

Drawdowns

FTGS vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGS drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTGS	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-17.87%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	0.00%	-1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-3.11%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTGS	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.45%	33.41%	-19.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.15%	33.41%	-16.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	33.41%	-16.26%

FTGS vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTGS vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

FTGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF	0.09%	0.16%	0.39%	0.62%	0.21%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTGS and SGRT in my portfolio?

FTGS and SGRT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTGS or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTGS or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTGS or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.09% for FTGS.

What is the main difference between FTGS and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTGS and 0.59% for SGRT.