PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGS vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGS achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.


FTGS

1D
-0.75%
1M
3.43%
YTD
5.22%
6M
5.10%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FTGS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
5.22%12.78%15.76%33.69%1.09%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGS and DGRO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.76

The correlation between FTGS and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTGS vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTGS
DGRO

Technology

30.6%
19.4%

Healthcare

17.6%
16.4%

Financial Services

16.2%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
5.7%

Industrials

12.3%
10.8%

Communication Services

5.7%
0.1%

Energy

4.8%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
11.5%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.9%

Technology

FTGS
30.6%
DGRO
19.4%

Healthcare

FTGS
17.6%
DGRO
16.4%

Financial Services

FTGS
16.2%
DGRO
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTGS
13.6%
DGRO
5.7%

Industrials

FTGS
12.3%
DGRO
10.8%

Communication Services

FTGS
5.7%
DGRO
0.1%

Energy

FTGS
4.8%
DGRO
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

FTGS
2.0%
DGRO
11.5%

Basic Materials

FTGS
1.9%
DGRO
2.5%

Real Estate

FTGS

-

DGRO

-

Utilities

FTGS

-

DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGS
FTGS Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FTGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGSDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.50

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

13.52

-9.01

FTGS vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGS and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGSDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.39

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.76

+0.34

Drawdowns

FTGS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGS drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGSDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-35.10%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-6.47%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-14.03%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.28%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-3.44%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.67%

+1.12%

Volatility

FTGS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that FTGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGSDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.21%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

6.91%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

9.48%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

13.82%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

16.62%

+0.53%

FTGS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

FTGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FTGS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
0.09%0.16%0.39%0.62%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGS and DGRO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGS has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGS dropped -19.99% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 3-year performance, FTGS leads with 18.88% vs 16.99% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FTGS has performed better with a 18.88% return vs 16.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTGS.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.09% for FTGS.

FTGS tracks The Growth Strength Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTGS and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGS and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer