FTGS vs. DGRO
FTGS (First Trust Growth Strength ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FTGS tracks the The Growth Strength Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTGS returned 18.88%/yr vs 16.99%/yr for DGRO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
FTGS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGS achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.
FTGS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
FTGS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF | 5.22% | 12.78% | 15.76% | 33.69% | 1.09% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | 4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGS and DGRO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FTGS and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTGS vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTGS
DGRO
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FTGS
DGRO
Healthcare
FTGS
DGRO
Financial Services
FTGS
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
FTGS
DGRO
Industrials
FTGS
DGRO
Communication Services
FTGS
DGRO
Energy
FTGS
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
FTGS
DGRO
Basic Materials
FTGS
DGRO
Real Estate
FTGS
-
DGRO
-
Utilities
FTGS
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
FTGS
DGRO
FTGS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.50 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 13.52 | -9.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.39 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.76 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
FTGS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGS drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -35.10% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | -6.47% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -14.03% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -0.28% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -3.44% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.67% | +1.12% |
Volatility
FTGS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that FTGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.21% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 6.91% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 9.48% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 13.82% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 16.62% | +0.53% |
FTGS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
FTGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF | 0.09% | 0.16% | 0.39% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGS and DGRO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTGS has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGS dropped -19.99% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 3-year performance, FTGS leads with 18.88% vs 16.99% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTGS has performed better with a 18.88% return vs 16.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTGS.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.09% for FTGS.
FTGS tracks The Growth Strength Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTGS and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTGS and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer