FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE
FTGS.DE (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation) and XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - FTGS.DE tracks the First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders while XDEV.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTGS.DE returned 6.17%/yr vs 26.76%/yr for XDEV.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGS.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.DE.
Performance
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGS.DE achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.DE's 35.07% return.
FTGS.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- -2.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 35.07%
- 6M
- 38.48%
- 1Y
- 63.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.76%
- 5Y*
- 17.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGS.DE First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | -0.93% | -0.97% | 16.36% | 8.51% | -0.83% |
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 35.07% | 24.76% | 11.62% | 15.67% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGS.DE and XDEV.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTGS.DE and XDEV.DE has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGS.DE
XDEV.DE
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGS.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.81 | -0.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 10.38 | -10.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 39.12 | -40.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGS.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 4.52 | -4.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.DE drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS.DE and XDEV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGS.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -35.28% | +21.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.05% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -18.02% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -1.07% | -5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -5.56% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 1.61% | +1.57% |
Volatility
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) is 3.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that FTGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGS.DE | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 5.77% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | 11.20% | -4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.07% | 13.89% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 13.96% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 15.90% | -4.21% |
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGS.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGS.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGS.DE nor XDEV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGS.DE and XDEV.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEV.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEV.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTGS.DE.
FTGS.DE tracks First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders, while XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTGS.DE and 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
Find the right allocation for FTGS.DE and XDEV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer