FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE).
FTGS.DE and FTGQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTGS.DE is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders. It was launched on Mar 9, 2021. FTGQ.DE is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Dec 20, 2024.
Performance
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTGS.DE First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | -3.21% | -0.97% | -0.03% |
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | -1.26% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGS.DE achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than FTGQ.DE's -1.26% return.
FTGS.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -5.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGS.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGS.DE
FTGQ.DE
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | 0.62 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | 0.89 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.14 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.85 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 3.29 | -4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 0.62 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.24 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGS.DE and FTGQ.DE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGS.DE nor FTGQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown of -19.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS.DE and FTGQ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -19.13% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -9.10% | -1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -4.18% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -6.58% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 2.34% | +1.52% |
Volatility
FTGS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) at 2.65%. This indicates that FTGS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTGS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 2.65% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.32% | 6.43% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 12.64% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 13.34% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 13.34% | -1.59% |