FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE).
FTGS.DE and CSY9.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTGS.DE is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders. It was launched on Mar 9, 2021. CSY9.DE is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. It was launched on Jul 24, 2020. Both FTGS.DE and CSY9.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGS.DE First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | -3.21% | -0.97% | 16.36% | 8.51% | -0.83% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | -1.04% | -0.67% | 16.05% | 5.76% | 2.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGS.DE achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than CSY9.DE's -1.04% return.
FTGS.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -5.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- -3.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGS.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGS.DE
CSY9.DE
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGS.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | -0.30 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | -0.32 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.34 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -0.97 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGS.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | -0.30 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.55 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGS.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGS.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CSY9.DE drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGS.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -13.92% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -10.38% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -6.70% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.66% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 2.94% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FTGS.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 3.00%. This indicates that FTGS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTGS.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 3.00% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.32% | 5.79% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 11.51% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 12.06% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 12.03% | -0.28% |