FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE
FTGS.DE (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation) and WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FTGS.DE tracks the First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders while WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTGS.DE returned 6.17%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for WRLD.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGS.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for WRLD.DE.
Performance
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGS.DE achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.
FTGS.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- -2.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGS.DE First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation | -0.93% | -0.97% | 16.36% | 8.51% | -0.83% |
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 18.45% | 11.71% | 1.59% | 11.63% | -1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGS.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTGS.DE and WRLD.DE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGS.DE
WRLD.DE
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGS.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.34 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.57 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 11.33 | -12.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGS.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 1.91 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum WRLD.DE drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS.DE and WRLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGS.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -23.55% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -7.90% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -19.51% | +5.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -0.38% | -6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -9.51% | +5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.50% | +0.68% |
Volatility
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) is 3.10%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FTGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGS.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 4.50% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | 11.34% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.07% | 14.81% | -5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 16.98% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 16.98% | -5.29% |
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGS.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGS.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGS.DE nor WRLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGS.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRLD.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTGS.DE.
FTGS.DE tracks First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTGS.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for FTGS.DE and WRLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer