PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGS.DE achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.05% return.


FTGS.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
1.61%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
-2.79%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUI.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
8.37%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.81%
1Y
44.12%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FTGS.DE
First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation
-0.93%-0.97%16.36%8.51%-0.83%
CBUI.DE
iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
20.05%20.98%13.82%15.94%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGS.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between FTGS.DE and CBUI.DE has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGS.DE
FTGS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FTGS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUI.DE
CBUI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGS.DECBUI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.60

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

6.92

-7.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

26.41

-27.29

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGS.DE and CBUI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGS.DECBUI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

3.41

-3.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.05

-0.63

Drawdowns

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum CBUI.DE drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS.DE and CBUI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGS.DECBUI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-19.48%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.34%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-19.48%

+5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-0.22%

-6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-3.23%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

1.67%

+1.51%

Volatility

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FTGS.DE) is 3.10%, while iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that FTGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGS.DECBUI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

3.73%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

9.76%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.07%

12.88%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.69%

14.21%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.69%

14.21%

-2.52%

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGS.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGS.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTGS.DE nor CBUI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGS.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUI.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUI.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTGS.DE.

FTGS.DE tracks First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders, while CBUI.DE tracks MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTGS.DE and 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGS.DE and CBUI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer