FTGC vs. SBLK
FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust, while SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FTGC returned 8.01%/yr vs 29.20%/yr for SBLK. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FTGC vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 27.22% return, which is significantly lower than SBLK's 54.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FTGC has underperformed SBLK with an annualized return of 8.01%, while SBLK has yielded a comparatively higher 29.20% annualized return.
FTGC
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- YTD
- 27.22%
- 1Y
- 38.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.31%
SBLK
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 29.65%
- YTD
- 54.81%
- 1Y
- 64.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.92%
- 10Y*
- 29.20%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.55M | $14.47M | $23.37M | |
| $36.73M | $32.98M | $35.30M |
FTGC vs. SBLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 27.22% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -12.75% | 2.73% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 54.81% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 185.15% | -24.77% | 29.82% | -18.83% | 120.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGC and SBLK is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013 | 0.25 |
The correlation between FTGC and SBLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGC vs. SBLK — Risk / Return Rank
FTGC
SBLK
FTGC vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTGC | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.69 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 9.75 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTGC vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, smaller than the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and SBLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGC | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -99.76% | +40.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -17.49% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -48.44% | +36.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -48.44% | +25.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | -73.77% | +37.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -93.01% | +88.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -82.76% | +55.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 6.61% | -2.86% |
Volatility
FTGC vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 4.34%, while Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGC | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 12.52% | -8.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 24.80% | -11.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 31.63% | -15.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 42.59% | -26.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 51.77% | -37.04% |
Dividends
FTGC vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison
FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.23%, more than SBLK's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.23% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.58% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGC and SBLK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBLK has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to FTGC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs SBLK's -99.76%.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTGC and SBLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer