FTGC vs. FRO

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FRO (Frontline Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FTGC returned 7.29%/yr vs 25.40%/yr for FRO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FTGC vs. FRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 23.17% return, which is significantly lower than FRO's 88.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FTGC has underperformed FRO with an annualized return of 7.29%, while FRO has yielded a comparatively higher 25.40% annualized return.

FTGC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.98%
• 6M: 21.09%
• YTD: 23.17%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 7.29%

FRO

• 1D: 4.29%
• 1M: 7.17%
• 6M: 64.34%
• YTD: 88.15%
• 1Y: 120.41%
• 3Y*: 47.42%
• 5Y*: 45.52%
• 10Y*: 25.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. FRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	23.17%	14.61%	9.96%	-5.36%	17.36%	27.95%	2.17%	6.40%	-12.75%	2.73%
FRO Frontline Ltd.	88.15%	61.17%	-22.48%	96.23%	73.67%	13.67%	-41.47%	134.59%	20.48%	-32.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and FRO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.26

The correlation between FTGC and FRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FTGC vs. FRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 74
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FRO

FRO Risk / Return Rank: 95
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. FRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTGC	FRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.98	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.40	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.41	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	6.01	-3.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.04	16.05	-7.01

FTGC vs. FRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and FRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. FRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, smaller than the maximum FRO drawdown of -98.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and FRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTGC	FRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.47%	-98.36%	+38.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.34%	-21.41%	+9.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	-52.04%	+39.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-52.04%	+29.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.91%	-52.04%	+16.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.64%	-70.70%	+63.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.27%	-67.85%	+40.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	8.00%	-4.36%

Volatility

FTGC vs. FRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 4.13%, while Frontline Ltd. (FRO) has a volatility of 18.96%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTGC	FRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	18.96%	-14.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.34%	33.34%	-20.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	43.27%	-27.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	49.84%	-33.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	51.16%	-36.45%

Dividends

FTGC vs. FRO - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.73%, more than FRO's 8.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRO Frontline Ltd.	8.21%	4.26%	13.74%	14.31%	1.24%	0.00%	25.72%	0.78%	0.00%	6.54%	19.83%	1.67%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	15.73%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTGC and FRO in my portfolio?

FTGC and FRO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTGC or FRO?

FRO has higher volatility (18.96%) compared to FTGC (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs FRO's -98.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.