FTGC vs. CMDY
FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. FTGC is actively managed, while CMDY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTGC returned 13.08%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for CMDY. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTGC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
FTGC vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than CMDY's 25.44% return.
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
CMDY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 25.44%
- 6M
- 24.53%
- 1Y
- 37.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 27.15% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -13.07% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 25.44% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -9.33% | 14.55% | 26.38% | 1.15% | 4.96% | -11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGC and CMDY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FTGC and CMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGC vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
FTGC
CMDY
FTGC vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGC | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.42 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 4.82 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.39 | 14.50 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGC | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.32 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.68 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.56 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
FTGC vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGC | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -31.19% | -28.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -7.73% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.39% | -10.08% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -26.56% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -3.97% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -13.14% | -14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.57% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FTGC vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 4.50%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGC | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 5.04% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 14.20% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 16.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.80% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 14.63% | +0.08% |
FTGC vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGC vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than CMDY's 10.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.28% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.08% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FTGC and CMDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CMDY has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to FTGC (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs CMDY's -31.19%.
On 5-year performance, FTGC leads with 13.08% vs 10.71% for CMDY. On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.08%, compared with 10.28% for CMDY.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 0.28% for CMDY.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTGC and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer