FTGC vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTGC returned 13.08%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for BCI. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTGC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

FTGC vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTGC having a 27.15% return and BCI slightly lower at 26.68%.

FTGC

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -2.63%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 26.06%
• 1Y: 41.32%
• 3Y*: 18.13%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	27.15%	14.61%	9.96%	-5.36%	17.36%	27.95%	2.17%	6.40%	-12.75%	3.54%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	26.18%	-2.77%	7.06%	-11.21%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and BCI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017	0.89

The correlation between FTGC and BCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTGC vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 81
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTGC	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.30	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	2.92	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.41	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	5.10	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.39	13.14	+4.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTGC vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTGC	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	2.30	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.66	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.48	-0.24

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTGC	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.47%	-32.69%	-26.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-7.61%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.39%	-11.38%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-26.50%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.65%	-4.52%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.42%	-12.00%	-15.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.95%	-0.57%

Volatility

FTGC vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 4.50%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTGC	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	5.16%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	14.80%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	16.92%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	16.82%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	15.65%	-0.94%

FTGC vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTGC vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than BCI's 13.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	15.08%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTGC and BCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FTGC and BCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FTGC or BCI?

BCI has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FTGC (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, FTGC or BCI?

On 5-year performance, FTGC leads with 13.08% vs 11.07% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTGC or BCI?

Over the 5-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTGC or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTGC or BCI?

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.08%, compared with 13.01% for BCI.

What is the main difference between FTGC and BCI?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 0.25% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.