PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTFEX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class M (FTFEX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTFEX achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FTFEX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 8.72%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


FTFEX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.15%
YTD
8.08%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
8.72%

JRLVX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.05%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTFEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class M
8.08%16.59%8.45%14.02%-17.25%10.62%14.54%22.23%-6.97%18.72%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.32%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FTFEX and JRLVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.97

The correlation between FTFEX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTFEX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTFEX
FTFEX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class M (FTFEX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTFEXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.31

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

14.68

-2.78

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTFEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTFEX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTFEXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.50

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.65

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.71

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.65

-0.22

Drawdowns

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTFEX drawdown since its inception was -53.97%, which is greater than JRLVX's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFEX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTFEXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.97%

-32.53%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-8.50%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.91%

-15.27%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-25.64%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.00%

-32.53%

+7.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-4.56%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.91%

-0.29%

Volatility

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class M (FTFEX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTFEXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.34%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.96%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

11.27%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.72%

14.77%

-4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

15.99%

-4.49%

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTFEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTFEX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FTFEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than JRLVX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTFEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class M
7.12%7.14%2.54%1.54%8.69%9.31%6.21%6.59%10.51%5.24%4.45%3.85%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FTFEX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to FTFEX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTFEX dropped -53.97% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTFEX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer