PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTF vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTF vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust (FTF) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTF achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 4.15% return.


FTF

1D
0.09%
1M
1.50%
6M
0.13%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
3.92%

BRW

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.04%
6M
3.76%
YTD
4.15%
1Y
-3.85%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTF vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FTF
Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust
1.27%4.16%19.50%12.22%-23.49%4.87%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
4.15%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FTF and BRW is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTF vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTF
FTF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTF vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust (FTF) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTFBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.96

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.22

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

-0.37

+1.15

FTF vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTF and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTF vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTF drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTF and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTFBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.15%

-17.74%

-33.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-17.74%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-17.74%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.55%

-17.74%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-8.23%

+7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-4.06%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

10.44%

-7.95%

Volatility

FTF vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust (FTF) is 1.63%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that FTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTFBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

3.37%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

8.42%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.21%

13.46%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.07%

12.95%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

12.87%

+0.99%

FTF vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTF has a 3.92% expense ratio, which is higher than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTF vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

FTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%, less than BRW's 15.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.25%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTF
Franklin Limited Duration Income Trust
12.60%12.00%11.13%11.41%12.62%10.26%9.50%10.73%12.37%10.86%6.56%6.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTF and BRW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FTF (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTF dropped -51.15% vs BRW's -17.74%.

FTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTF and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer