PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEU.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTEU.L is traded in USD, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTEU.L having a 12.33% return and UD03.L slightly lower at 12.01%.


FTEU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
2.06%
YTD
12.33%
6M
16.13%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
25.79%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

UD03.L

1D
0.31%
1M
3.82%
YTD
12.01%
6M
15.93%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.33%57.74%2.77%16.49%-18.83%11.78%5.07%-0.48%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.01%34.24%-1.18%32.58%-17.04%10.94%4.81%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEU.L and UD03.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.29

Over the past year, FTEU.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEU.L
UD03.L

Industrials

27.4%
12.1%

Energy

10.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

10.6%
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
7.0%

Utilities

8.3%
7.7%

Basic Materials

7.5%
4.2%

Real Estate

6.0%

-

Technology

6.0%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
14.6%

Healthcare

5.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.1%

Industrials

FTEU.L
27.4%
UD03.L
12.1%

Energy

FTEU.L
10.8%
UD03.L
2.7%

Financial Services

FTEU.L
10.6%
UD03.L
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEU.L
9.2%
UD03.L
7.0%

Utilities

FTEU.L
8.3%
UD03.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

FTEU.L
7.5%
UD03.L
4.2%

Real Estate

FTEU.L
6.0%
UD03.L

-

Technology

FTEU.L
6.0%
UD03.L
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

FTEU.L
5.3%
UD03.L
14.6%

Healthcare

FTEU.L
5.2%
UD03.L
4.1%

Communication Services

FTEU.L
3.7%
UD03.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTEU.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.95

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

13.51

-3.42

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEU.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTEU.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.75

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.15

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.96

-0.41

Drawdowns

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEU.L drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -39.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEU.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTEU.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.61%

-39.27%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-10.70%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-14.61%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-31.37%

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.22%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-5.02%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.39%

-1.15%

Volatility

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 4.33%. This indicates that FTEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTEU.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

4.33%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

19.34%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

37.10%

-16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

59.47%

-39.61%

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEU.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEU.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

FTEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEU.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FTEU.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEU.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer