PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. XNTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 32.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTEC having a 24.98% annualized return and XNTK not far ahead at 25.25%.


FTEC

1D
0.61%
1M
3.09%
YTD
24.27%
6M
24.36%
1Y
51.03%
3Y*
30.29%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
24.98%

XNTK

1D
0.69%
1M
9.85%
YTD
32.86%
6M
32.78%
1Y
65.70%
3Y*
39.05%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
25.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEC vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
24.27%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
32.86%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and XNTK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.93

The correlation between FTEC and XNTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTEC vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEC
XNTK

Technology

98.3%
83.3%

Industrials

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Energy

0.4%

-

Communication Services

0.0%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
8.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FTEC
98.3%
XNTK
83.3%

Industrials

FTEC
0.6%
XNTK

-

Financial Services

FTEC
0.5%
XNTK

-

Energy

FTEC
0.4%
XNTK

-

Communication Services

FTEC
0.0%
XNTK
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEC
0.0%
XNTK
8.0%

Basic Materials

FTEC
0.0%
XNTK

-

Consumer Defensive

FTEC

-

XNTK

-

Healthcare

FTEC

-

XNTK

-

Real Estate

FTEC

-

XNTK

-

Utilities

FTEC

-

XNTK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEC vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTECXNTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.73

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

12.16

-2.80

FTEC vs. XNTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the XNTK Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and XNTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and XNTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECXNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-72.38%

+37.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-17.00%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-28.11%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-48.28%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-48.28%

+13.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-4.70%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-21.28%

+15.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

5.21%

0.00%

Volatility

FTEC vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is 10.02%, while SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that FTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECXNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

12.53%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

20.87%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

25.43%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

28.25%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

26.82%

-2.01%

FTEC vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEC vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than XNTK's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.34%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.17%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FTEC and XNTK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XNTK has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to FTEC (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs XNTK's -72.38%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.25% vs 24.98% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.25% return vs 24.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.

FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.35% for XNTK.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and XNTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer