FTEC vs. XLV
FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTEC returned 25.51%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for XLV. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
FTEC vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 28.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 25.51%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
FTEC
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- 28.48%
- 6M
- 30.07%
- 1Y
- 56.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.16%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 25.51%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
FTEC vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 28.48% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.83% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTEC and XLV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTEC and XLV has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FTEC vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTEC
XLV
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTEC
XLV
-
Industrials
FTEC
XLV
-
Financial Services
FTEC
XLV
-
Energy
FTEC
XLV
-
Communication Services
FTEC
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTEC
XLV
-
Basic Materials
FTEC
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
FTEC
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
FTEC
-
XLV
Real Estate
FTEC
-
XLV
-
Utilities
FTEC
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTEC vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
FTEC
XLV
FTEC vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTEC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.17 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 1.37 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | 3.28 | +7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTEC vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTEC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -39.17% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -10.47% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | -17.11% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -17.11% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | -28.40% | -6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.04% | -4.17% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -7.12% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 4.37% | +0.84% |
Volatility
FTEC vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.96%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTEC | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 4.96% | +5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.33% | 10.58% | +7.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 15.05% | +7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 14.75% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 16.58% | +8.26% |
FTEC vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FTEC and XLV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTEC vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTEC and XLV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to XLV (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.51% vs 9.89% for XLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.51% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC and XLV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.33% for FTEC.
FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTEC and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer