PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. SRET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. SRET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed SRET with an annualized return of 25.18%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.19% annualized return.


FTEC

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
22.66%
6M
20.59%
1Y
43.89%
3Y*
30.26%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
25.18%

SRET

1D
0.55%
1M
0.39%
YTD
6.56%
6M
6.91%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEC vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
22.66%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
6.56%18.09%-1.55%9.85%-18.24%14.00%-36.63%22.77%-5.52%17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and SRET is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between FTEC and SRET has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SRET
SRET Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEC vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTECSRETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.64

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

6.74

+1.55

FTEC vs. SRET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the SRET Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and SRET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and SRET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECSRETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-66.98%

+32.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-9.48%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-18.87%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-29.43%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-66.98%

+32.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.39%

-22.17%

+13.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-22.48%

+16.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

2.30%

+3.01%

Volatility

FTEC vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.78%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECSRETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

3.78%

+7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.57%

9.15%

+9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.79%

11.51%

+11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

16.50%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

24.59%

+0.27%

FTEC vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEC vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SRET's 7.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
7.91%7.98%8.72%7.21%8.30%6.33%8.88%7.83%8.54%8.20%8.08%7.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEC and SRET have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to SRET (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs SRET's -66.98%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.18% vs 1.19% for SRET. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.18% return vs 1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.

SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.

FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while SRET is REIT. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.58% for SRET.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and SRET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer