PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 31.89% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.29% return.


FTEC

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.21%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.74%
1Y
60.87%
3Y*
33.93%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
25.57%

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEC vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
31.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-16.77%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and QTUM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.87

The correlation between FTEC and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTEC vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEC
QTUM

Technology

98.0%
84.2%

Industrials

0.6%
9.0%

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Energy

0.4%

-

Communication Services

0.0%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
0.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FTEC
98.0%
QTUM
84.2%

Industrials

FTEC
0.6%
QTUM
9.0%

Financial Services

FTEC
0.6%
QTUM

-

Energy

FTEC
0.4%
QTUM

-

Communication Services

FTEC
0.0%
QTUM
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEC
0.0%
QTUM
0.8%

Basic Materials

FTEC

-

QTUM

-

Consumer Defensive

FTEC

-

QTUM

-

Healthcare

FTEC

-

QTUM
0.7%

Real Estate

FTEC

-

QTUM

-

Utilities

FTEC

-

QTUM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEC vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTECQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.55

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

6.28

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

23.69

-11.60

FTEC vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTECQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

3.65

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.10

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.08

-0.09

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-38.45%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-15.26%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-25.39%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-38.45%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.59%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-8.25%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

4.04%

+1.01%

Volatility

FTEC vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is 6.43%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that FTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

9.76%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

20.35%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

26.26%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.23%

26.56%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

27.17%

-2.48%

FTEC vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEC vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEC and QTUM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 22.49% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 22.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer