PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTDS vs. LSAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTDS vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTDS achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than LSAF's 12.50% return.


FTDS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.72%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.75%

LSAF

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.14%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.20%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTDS vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
6.54%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-17.33%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
12.50%12.01%18.09%15.48%-13.12%22.75%6.92%28.35%-15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FTDS and LSAF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FTDS and LSAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTDS vs. LSAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTDS
LSAF

Financial Services

27.9%
17.2%

Energy

20.2%
5.6%

Industrials

19.8%
15.4%

Healthcare

9.4%
9.3%

Technology

9.4%
16.4%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
7.3%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Financial Services

FTDS
27.9%
LSAF
17.2%

Energy

FTDS
20.2%
LSAF
5.6%

Industrials

FTDS
19.8%
LSAF
15.4%

Healthcare

FTDS
9.4%
LSAF
9.3%

Technology

FTDS
9.4%
LSAF
16.4%

Basic Materials

FTDS
8.0%
LSAF
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTDS
3.4%
LSAF
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTDS
1.9%
LSAF
7.3%

Communication Services

FTDS

-

LSAF
1.0%

Real Estate

FTDS

-

LSAF
2.2%

Utilities

FTDS

-

LSAF
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTDS vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAF
LSAF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LSAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTDS vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTDSLSAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.66

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

11.96

-4.40

FTDS vs. LSAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the LSAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTDS and LSAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTDSLSAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.67

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.47

-0.16

Drawdowns

FTDS vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than LSAF's maximum drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and LSAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTDSLSAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-41.67%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.58%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-20.26%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-24.94%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-0.12%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-6.33%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.01%

+0.43%

Volatility

FTDS vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) is 3.48%, while LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that FTDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTDSLSAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.74%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

10.27%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

14.42%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

18.39%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

21.88%

-1.74%

FTDS vs. LSAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTDS vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison

FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than LSAF's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
0.61%0.69%0.42%0.84%0.96%0.37%0.53%0.71%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTDS and LSAF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSAF has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to FTDS (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs LSAF's -41.67%.

On 5-year performance, LSAF leads with 9.83% vs 6.32% for FTDS. On fees, FTDS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FTDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LSAF has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTDS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LSAF.

FTDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.61% for LSAF.

FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while LSAF tracks AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.75% for LSAF.

LSAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTDS and LSAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer