PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTDS vs. FNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTDS vs. FNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTDS achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than FNX's 13.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FTDS has underperformed FNX with an annualized return of 11.06%, while FNX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.


FTDS

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
7.13%
6M
6.12%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
11.06%

FNX

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.08%
YTD
13.83%
6M
11.69%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTDS vs. FNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
7.13%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
13.83%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FTDS and FNX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.69

The correlation between FTDS and FNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTDS vs. FNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTDS
FNX

Financial Services

28.4%
18.7%

Industrials

19.6%
18.2%

Energy

19.6%
5.7%

Technology

9.4%
13.3%

Healthcare

9.3%
10.1%

Basic Materials

8.5%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Real Estate

-

7.1%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Financial Services

FTDS
28.4%
FNX
18.7%

Industrials

FTDS
19.6%
FNX
18.2%

Energy

FTDS
19.6%
FNX
5.7%

Technology

FTDS
9.4%
FNX
13.3%

Healthcare

FTDS
9.3%
FNX
10.1%

Basic Materials

FTDS
8.5%
FNX
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTDS
3.4%
FNX
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTDS
1.8%
FNX
3.2%

Communication Services

FTDS

-

FNX
2.4%

Real Estate

FTDS

-

FNX
7.1%

Utilities

FTDS

-

FNX
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTDS vs. FNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTDS vs. FNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTDSFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.00

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

10.30

-3.01

FTDS vs. FNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTDS and FNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTDS vs. FNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTDS drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FNX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTDS and FNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTDSFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-57.11%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-9.24%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-24.97%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-24.97%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-43.95%

+1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-0.55%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-8.38%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.68%

-0.11%

Volatility

FTDS vs. FNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) is 3.16%, while First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that FTDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTDSFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

4.58%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

11.71%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

16.39%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

20.51%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

21.96%

-1.83%

FTDS vs. FNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FNX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTDS vs. FNX - Dividend Comparison

FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than FNX's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.82%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTDS and FNX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FTDS (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTDS dropped -56.53% vs FNX's -57.11%.

On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 12.45% vs 11.06% for FTDS. On fees, FNX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTDS.

FTDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.82% for FNX.

FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index, while FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTDS and 0.60% for FNX.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTDS and FNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer