FTCS vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FTCS is passively managed, while EBI is actively managed. Over the past year, FTCS returned 5.00% vs 30.46% for EBI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTCS charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

FTCS vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 13.70% return.

FTCS

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.00%
• 3Y*: 9.52%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

EBI

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCS vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF	1.20%	3.72%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	13.70%	15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCS and EBI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.66

The correlation between FTCS and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTCS vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCS

FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 16
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 84
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCS vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTCS	EBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	2.46	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	3.37	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.43	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	4.32	-3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	17.50	-16.01

FTCS vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCS and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTCS vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than EBI's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTCS	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.64%	-17.05%	-36.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.74%	-7.09%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.85%	-1.43%	-4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.92%	-2.03%	-4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	1.75%	+1.61%

Volatility

FTCS vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is 3.07%, while Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that FTCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTCS	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	4.03%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.25%	9.27%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	12.49%	-2.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	17.88%	-4.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.53%	17.88%	-2.35%

FTCS vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTCS vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than EBI's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF	1.11%	1.04%	1.33%	1.47%	1.23%	1.06%	0.93%	1.26%	1.26%	1.15%	1.43%	1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTCS and EBI in my portfolio?

FTCS and EBI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTCS or EBI?

EBI has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to FTCS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs EBI's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, FTCS or EBI?

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 30.46% vs 5.00% for FTCS. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTCS or EBI?

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 30.46% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTCS or EBI?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTCS or EBI?

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.92% for EBI.

What is the main difference between FTCS and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.24% for EBI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.