PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCHX vs. FIKGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCHX achieves a 38.85% return, which is significantly lower than FIKGX's 74.74% return.


FTCHX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
38.85%
6M
35.18%
1Y
60.86%
3Y*
36.74%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
20.88%

FIKGX

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.39%
YTD
74.74%
6M
71.56%
1Y
131.85%
3Y*
57.08%
5Y*
39.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTCHX
Invesco Technology Fund
38.85%20.77%34.49%47.38%-39.96%13.00%46.14%35.62%-14.56%
FIKGX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z
74.74%45.43%35.88%75.75%-34.81%58.07%44.21%64.45%-11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCHX and FIKGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.87

The correlation between FTCHX and FIKGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCHX vs. FIKGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCHX
FTCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKGX
FIKGX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FIKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCHXFIKGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.54

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

9.27

-4.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.74

33.34

-18.61

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the FIKGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCHX and FIKGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCHX drawdown since its inception was -87.78%, which is greater than FIKGX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCHX and FIKGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCHXFIKGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.78%

-45.98%

-41.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-14.64%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.38%

-39.67%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.89%

-45.98%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-7.44%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.36%

-9.77%

-26.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

4.06%

+0.12%

Volatility

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) is 15.05%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a volatility of 19.71%. This indicates that FTCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCHXFIKGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.05%

19.71%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

29.73%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.68%

36.51%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.43%

39.18%

-9.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.70%

38.75%

-12.05%

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCHX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCHX vs. FIKGX - Dividend Comparison

FTCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.13%, more than FIKGX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKGX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z
3.82%6.67%0.00%3.14%3.08%4.19%4.54%1.08%19.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTCHX
Invesco Technology Fund
19.13%26.56%13.59%0.80%1.60%27.66%7.06%9.58%9.01%4.14%6.98%6.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FTCHX and FIKGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIKGX has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to FTCHX (15.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCHX dropped -87.78% vs FIKGX's -45.98%.

FIKGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCHX and FIKGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer