FTCHX vs. MLAAX

In the year-to-date period, FTCHX achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly lower than MLAAX's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCHX has underperformed MLAAX with an annualized return of 13.09%, while MLAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FTCHX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than MLAAX's 0.93% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FTCHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the MLAAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCHX and MLAAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FTCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.05%, less than MLAAX's 21.85% yield.

The maximum FTCHX drawdown since its inception was -87.78%, which is greater than MLAAX's maximum drawdown of -48.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCHX and MLAAX.

Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.