FTCHX vs. MLAAX

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

FTCHX (Invesco Technology Fund) and MLAAX (MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FTCHX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Invesco, while MLAAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by New York Life. Over the past 10 years, FTCHX returned 19.46%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for MLAAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTCHX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for MLAAX.

Performance

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCHX achieves a 29.22% return, which is significantly higher than MLAAX's -1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCHX has outperformed MLAAX with an annualized return of 19.46%, while MLAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.30% annualized return.

FTCHX

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: 29.22%
• 6M: 25.12%
• 1Y: 54.83%
• 3Y*: 34.25%
• 5Y*: 14.42%
• 10Y*: 19.46%

MLAAX

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: -1.25%
• 6M: -2.69%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 16.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTCHX Invesco Technology Fund	29.22%	20.77%	34.49%	47.38%	-39.96%	13.00%	46.14%	35.62%	-0.88%	34.78%
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund	-1.25%	14.20%	28.95%	43.10%	-31.51%	25.00%	36.95%	33.18%	3.81%	32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCHX and MLAAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 1995	0.90

The correlation between FTCHX and MLAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTCHX vs. MLAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCHX

FTCHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FTCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FTCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FTCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FTCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FTCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

MLAAX

MLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6
MLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
MLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTCHX	MLAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	0.40	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	0.64	+1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.08	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	0.33	+3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.57	0.97	+12.59

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the MLAAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCHX and MLAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCHX drawdown since its inception was -87.78%, which is greater than MLAAX's maximum drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCHX and MLAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTCHX	MLAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.78%	-83.01%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.29%	-20.28%	+5.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.38%	-35.43%	+5.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.89%	-39.36%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.89%	-39.36%	-8.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.22%	-10.85%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.39%	-38.78%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	6.97%	-2.87%

Volatility

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) at 6.11%. This indicates that FTCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTCHX	MLAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.13%	6.11%	+6.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.84%	13.28%	+10.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.91%	17.12%	+11.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.05%	25.65%	+3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.52%	25.75%	+0.77%

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCHX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than MLAAX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTCHX vs. MLAAX - Dividend Comparison

FTCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.55%, less than MLAAX's 24.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTCHX Invesco Technology Fund	20.55%	26.56%	13.59%	0.80%	1.60%	27.66%	7.06%	9.58%	9.01%	4.14%	6.98%	6.88%
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund	24.68%	24.37%	22.54%	10.59%	14.95%	26.64%	5.40%	11.55%	23.59%	17.20%	13.18%	13.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTCHX and MLAAX in my portfolio?

FTCHX and MLAAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTCHX or MLAAX?

FTCHX has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to MLAAX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCHX dropped -87.78% vs MLAAX's -83.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.