PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCE vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCE vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 4.46% return.


FTCE

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
8.46%
6M
7.63%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.60%
1Y
14.18%
3Y*
12.23%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCE vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTCE and PSCX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

0.80

The correlation between FTCE and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTCE vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTCE
PSCX

Technology

38.9%
33.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
10.0%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.6%

Industrials

8.3%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.0%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.4%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.0%

Technology

FTCE
38.9%
PSCX
33.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTCE
11.9%
PSCX
10.0%

Financial Services

FTCE
10.6%
PSCX
12.5%

Healthcare

FTCE
8.7%
PSCX
9.6%

Industrials

FTCE
8.3%
PSCX
8.4%

Communication Services

FTCE
8.0%
PSCX
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

FTCE
4.2%
PSCX
5.4%

Energy

FTCE
3.5%
PSCX
4.2%

Utilities

FTCE
2.0%
PSCX
2.6%

Basic Materials

FTCE
2.0%
PSCX
1.9%

Real Estate

FTCE
2.0%
PSCX
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCE vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCE
FTCE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FTCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCE vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCEPSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.39

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

17.03

-7.60

FTCE vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCE and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCE vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and PSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCEPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-10.20%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-4.20%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-0.75%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-1.85%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

0.83%

+2.00%

Volatility

FTCE vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 1.79%. This indicates that FTCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCEPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

1.79%

+3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

4.52%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

5.65%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

7.11%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

6.97%

+9.91%

FTCE vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCE vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTCE and PSCX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCE has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to PSCX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCE dropped -18.11% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

On 1-year performance, FTCE leads with 26.64% vs 14.18% for PSCX. On fees, FTCE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTCE has performed better with a 26.64% return vs 14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTCE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

FTCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTCE and 0.75% for PSCX.

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCE and PSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer