PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCE vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCE vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.


FTCE

1D
0.28%
1M
10.79%
YTD
14.69%
6M
15.43%
1Y
37.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNAV

1D
1.11%
1M
21.60%
YTD
47.26%
6M
48.02%
1Y
72.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCE vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTCE
First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF
14.69%26.14%-0.04%
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
47.26%16.80%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCE and CNAV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

0.73

The correlation between FTCE and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCE vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCE
FTCE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCE vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCECNAVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

2.91

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

3.62

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.48

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

5.63

-1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.49

24.09

-9.60

FTCE vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCE Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCE and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCECNAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.91

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

1.62

-0.12

Drawdowns

FTCE vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCECNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-30.06%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-12.97%

+2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-5.42%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.02%

-0.38%

Volatility

FTCE vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) is 3.33%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that FTCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCECNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

12.28%

-8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

21.02%

-10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

25.08%

-12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

27.16%

-10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

27.16%

-10.40%

FTCE vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCE vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTCE
First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF
0.79%0.96%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCE and CNAV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to FTCE (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCE dropped -18.11% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 37.80% for FTCE. On fees, FTCE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTCE has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 37.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTCE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

FTCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTCE and 1.31% for CNAV.

FTCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCE and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer