FTCE vs. BUFH
FTCE (First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTCE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTCE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
FTCE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.49% return.
FTCE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 37.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTCE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF | 14.69% | 15.39% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.49% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCE and BUFH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTCE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
FTCE
BUFH
FTCE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTCE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.91 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTCE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 2.94 | -1.44 |
Drawdowns
FTCE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -1.53% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -0.18% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility
FTCE vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTCE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 2.37% | +10.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 2.37% | +14.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 2.37% | +14.39% |
FTCE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTCE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTCE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF | 0.79% | 0.96% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTCE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTCE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTCE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
FTCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
FTCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTCE and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for FTCE and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer