FTCE vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTCE (First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FTCE is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past year, FTCE returned 26.64% vs 11.63% for BDGS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTCE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

FTCE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.21% return.

FTCE

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 7.63%
• 1Y: 26.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF	8.46%	26.14%	-0.02%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCE and BDGS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.72

The correlation between FTCE and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTCE vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTCE	BDGS
Technology	38.9%	37.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	10.9%
Financial Services	10.6%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.7%	7.5%
Industrials	8.3%	6.6%
Communication Services	8.0%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	4.1%
Energy	3.5%	2.6%
Utilities	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.5%

Return for Risk

FTCE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCE

FTCE Risk / Return Rank: 62
FTCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FTCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FTCE Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FTCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FTCE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTCE	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.84	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.75	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.90	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	12.72	-3.29

FTCE vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCE and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTCE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTCE	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-9.12%	-8.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-4.03%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.44%	-2.17%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-0.66%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	0.92%	+1.91%

Volatility

FTCE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that FTCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTCE	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	2.30%	+3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.06%	5.17%	+5.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.76%	6.38%	+7.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	8.22%	+8.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	8.22%	+8.66%

FTCE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTCE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF	0.83%	0.96%	0.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTCE and BDGS in my portfolio?

FTCE and BDGS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTCE or BDGS?

FTCE has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCE dropped -18.11% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, FTCE or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, FTCE leads with 26.64% vs 11.63% for BDGS. On fees, FTCE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTCE or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, FTCE has performed better with a 26.64% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTCE or BDGS?

FTCE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTCE or BDGS?

FTCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between FTCE and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTCE and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.