FTC vs. SGRT
FTC (First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FTC is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
FTC vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTC achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
FTC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTC vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 17.25% | 3.52% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTC and SGRT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTC vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
FTC
SGRT
FTC vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 3.81 | -3.28 |
Drawdowns
FTC vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTC drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.05% | -17.87% | -36.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -3.11% | -6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility
FTC vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTC | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 33.41% | -15.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 33.41% | -13.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 33.41% | -12.96% |
FTC vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTC vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
FTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.65% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.86% | 0.52% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTC and SGRT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTC.
FTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTC and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for FTC and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer