FTC vs. QARP
FTC (First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FTC tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTC returned 10.89%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
FTC vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTC achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.
FTC
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 17.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FTC vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 10.98% | 15.89% | 26.60% | 20.72% | -23.28% | 24.43% | 33.35% | 28.07% | -9.41% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTC and QARP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FTC and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTC vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTC
QARP
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
FTC
QARP
Industrials
FTC
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
FTC
QARP
Healthcare
FTC
QARP
Financial Services
FTC
QARP
Basic Materials
FTC
QARP
Communication Services
FTC
QARP
Real Estate
FTC
QARP
Utilities
FTC
QARP
Consumer Defensive
FTC
QARP
Energy
FTC
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTC vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
FTC
QARP
FTC vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTC | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.46 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 15.38 | -9.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTC vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTC drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTC | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.05% | -35.44% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -7.26% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -15.65% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.18% | -22.75% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | 0.00% | -8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -4.39% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.63% | +1.41% |
Volatility
FTC vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that FTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTC | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 2.76% | +5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.38% | 8.22% | +9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 10.58% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 15.54% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 19.55% | +1.14% |
FTC vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTC vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
FTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.15% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.65% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.40% | 0.86% | 0.52% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTC and QARP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTC has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTC dropped -54.05% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 10.89% for FTC. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTC.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.15% for FTC.
FTC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTC and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTC and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer