FTC vs. DARP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FTC (First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FTC is passively managed, while DARP is actively managed. Over the past year, FTC returned 16.95% vs 53.03% for DARP. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTC charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DARP.

Performance

FTC vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTC achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 24.09% return.

FTC

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -2.62%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 1Y: 16.95%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: 9.77%
• 10Y*: 13.86%
• ALL TIME*: 10.41%

DARP

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: 11.54%
• YTD: 24.09%
• 1Y: 53.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 32.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	$367.14K	$288.77K	$436.18K
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	$3.58M	$2.78M	$2.73M

FTC vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	12.02%	15.89%	26.60%	11.43%
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	24.09%	40.19%	24.63%	6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FTC and DARP is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023	0.78

The correlation between FTC and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTC vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTC	DARP
Technology	37.9%	48.3%
Industrials	27.4%	8.2%
Healthcare	8.8%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	8.3%
Financial Services	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.7%	4.2%
Communication Services	2.1%	13.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Utilities	1.8%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	-
Energy	0.8%	9.2%

Return for Risk

FTC vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTC

FTC Risk / Return Rank: 35
FTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FTC Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FTC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 80
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTC vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTC	DARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.99	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	2.47	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.31	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	3.38	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.67	12.79	-8.12

FTC vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTC Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTC and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTC vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTC drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC and DARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTC	DARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.05%	-30.27%	-23.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.37%	-15.76%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.78%	-7.17%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-4.72%	-4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	4.16%	-0.52%

Volatility

FTC vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FTC) is 7.12%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that FTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTC	DARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.12%	9.89%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.86%	21.41%	-3.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.46%	26.90%	-5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.50%	26.84%	-6.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	26.84%	-6.08%

FTC vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTC vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

FTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than DARP's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.35%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTC First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.15%	0.20%	0.32%	0.65%	0.90%	0.00%	0.40%	0.64%	0.35%	0.40%	0.86%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTC and DARP in my portfolio?

FTC and DARP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTC or DARP?

DARP has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to FTC (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTC dropped -54.05% vs DARP's -30.27%.

Which ETF is better, FTC or DARP?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 53.03% vs 16.95% for FTC. On fees, FTC is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTC or DARP?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 53.03% return vs 16.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTC or DARP?

FTC is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTC or DARP?

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.15% for FTC.

What is the main difference between FTC and DARP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FTC and 0.75% for DARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.