PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTC.L vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTC.L vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Filtronic (FTC.L) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTC.L is traded in GBp, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTC.L achieves a 85.23% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FTC.L has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 40.18%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.80% annualized return.


FTC.L

1D
13.59%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
85.23%
6M
136.23%
1Y
123.29%
3Y*
192.70%
5Y*
99.76%
10Y*
40.18%

NEM

1D
-7.38%
1M
-11.52%
YTD
1.30%
6M
11.50%
1Y
88.10%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTC.L vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTC.L
Filtronic
85.23%131.58%256.81%53.51%20.65%32.95%-3.89%52.54%-39.49%-19.59%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.30%153.38%-6.22%-13.32%-11.35%8.42%36.16%25.55%-0.58%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FTC.L and NEM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.02

The correlation between FTC.L and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (10 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FTC.L:

£0.09

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

FTC.L:

37.18

NEM:

15.73

PEG Ratio

FTC.L:

0.05

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

FTC.L:

7.68

NEM:

4.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTC.L:

£98.52M

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTC.L:

£47.89M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTC.L:

£25.72M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTC.L vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTC.L
FTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTC.L vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Filtronic (FTC.L) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTC.LNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.49

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

9.73

-0.61

FTC.L vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTC.L and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTC.LNEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.95

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.65

0.32

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.43

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.25

-0.37

Drawdowns

FTC.L vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTC.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -75.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC.L and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTC.LNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-75.60%

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.81%

-25.39%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.81%

-34.40%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.81%

-61.44%

+22.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.72%

-61.44%

-20.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.73%

-22.14%

-77.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-30.10%

-52.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.66%

9.09%

+5.57%

Volatility

FTC.L vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Filtronic (FTC.L) has a higher volatility of 43.65% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 13.13%. This indicates that FTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTC.LNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.65%

13.13%

+30.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.72%

35.21%

+23.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.06%

45.46%

+23.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.59%

35.77%

+24.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.70%

34.58%

+31.12%

Dividends

FTC.L vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

FTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTC.L
Filtronic
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

FTC.L vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Filtronic and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.25M
0
(FTC.L) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FTC.L values in GBp, NEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FTC.L and NEM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTC.L and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer