PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTC.L vs. III.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTC.L vs. III.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Filtronic (FTC.L) and 3I Group plc (III.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTC.L achieves a 85.23% return, which is significantly higher than III.L's -32.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FTC.L has outperformed III.L with an annualized return of 40.18%, while III.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.20% annualized return.


FTC.L

1D
13.59%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
85.23%
6M
136.23%
1Y
123.29%
3Y*
192.70%
5Y*
99.76%
10Y*
40.18%

III.L

1D
2.77%
1M
-17.93%
YTD
-32.88%
6M
-32.22%
1Y
-46.08%
3Y*
6.24%
5Y*
15.02%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTC.L vs. III.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTC.L
Filtronic
85.23%131.58%256.81%53.51%20.65%32.95%-3.89%52.54%-39.49%-19.59%
III.L
3I Group plc
-32.88%-6.44%50.11%85.46%-3.46%28.99%9.36%47.12%-12.49%32.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FTC.L and III.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 1994

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTC.L:

£756.83M

III.L:

£22.29B

EPS

FTC.L:

£0.09

III.L:

£10.41

PE Ratio

FTC.L:

37.18

III.L:

2.10

PEG Ratio

FTC.L:

0.05

III.L:

0.26

PS Ratio

FTC.L:

7.68

III.L:

10.26

PB Ratio

FTC.L:

19.60

III.L:

0.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTC.L:

£98.52M

III.L:

£2.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTC.L:

£47.89M

III.L:

£5.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTC.L:

£25.72M

III.L:

£9.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTC.L vs. III.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTC.L
FTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

III.L
III.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
III.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
III.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTC.L vs. III.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Filtronic (FTC.L) and 3I Group plc (III.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTC.LIII.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.78

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

-0.87

+4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

-1.80

+10.92

FTC.L vs. III.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the III.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTC.L and III.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTC.LIII.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

-1.06

+3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.65

0.49

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.36

-0.49

Drawdowns

FTC.L vs. III.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTC.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than III.L's maximum drawdown of -84.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTC.L and III.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTC.LIII.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-84.42%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.81%

-52.78%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.81%

-52.78%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.81%

-52.78%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.72%

-52.78%

-28.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.73%

-50.33%

-49.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-26.70%

-55.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.66%

25.74%

-11.08%

Volatility

FTC.L vs. III.L - Volatility Comparison

Filtronic (FTC.L) has a higher volatility of 43.65% compared to 3I Group plc (III.L) at 19.25%. This indicates that FTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than III.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTC.LIII.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.65%

19.25%

+24.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.72%

37.71%

+21.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.06%

43.56%

+25.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.59%

30.83%

+29.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.70%

30.38%

+35.32%

Dividends

FTC.L vs. III.L - Dividend Comparison

FTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTC.L
Filtronic
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
III.L
3I Group plc
3.61%2.42%1.82%2.32%3.76%2.78%3.02%3.42%3.75%1.75%2.64%1.68%

Financials

FTC.L vs. III.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Filtronic and 3I Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.25M
236.00M
(FTC.L) Total Revenue
(III.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FTC.L and III.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTC.L and III.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer