PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBI vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBI achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 10.06% return.


FTBI

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.43%
YTD
5.53%
6M
4.65%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.39%
1M
3.97%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.27%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FTBI
First Trust Balanced Income ETF
5.53%11.60%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.06%22.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBI and YCS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBI
FTBI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FTBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTBIYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

4.14

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

13.04

-0.49

FTBI vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBI and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTBI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBI drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBI and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBIYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-49.56%

+44.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-8.30%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

0.00%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-19.87%

+19.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

2.63%

-1.43%

Volatility

FTBI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that FTBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBIYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.25%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.05%

11.91%

-5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.46%

16.93%

-9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

21.10%

-13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.35%

18.82%

-11.47%

FTBI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

FTBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
FTBI
First Trust Balanced Income ETF
7.95%4.76%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBI and YCS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTBI has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBI dropped -5.34% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 34.18% vs 15.08% for FTBI. On fees, FTBI is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 34.18% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTBI is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

FTBI is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FTBI and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBI and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer