PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBI vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBI vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBI achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.34% return.


FTBI

1D
0.20%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.80%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.50%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBI vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTBI and IBIC is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBI vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBI
FTBI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBI vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTBIIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

2.22

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

17.09

-13.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

66.52

-51.17

FTBI vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBI and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTBIIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

4.99

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

3.48

-0.83

Drawdowns

FTBI vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBI drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBI and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBIIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-0.90%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-0.26%

-5.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.16%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-0.10%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.07%

+1.10%

Volatility

FTBI vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.32%. This indicates that FTBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBIIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

0.32%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

0.67%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.15%

0.90%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

1.58%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

1.58%

+5.55%

FTBI vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBI vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

FTBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTBI
First Trust Balanced Income ETF
7.87%4.76%0.00%0.00%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBI and IBIC have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTBI has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to IBIC (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBI dropped -5.34% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, FTBI leads with 17.93% vs 4.49% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTBI has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.

FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

FTBI is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FTBI and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBI and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer