PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBI vs. HISF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBI vs. HISF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBI achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than HISF's 0.14% return.


FTBI

1D
0.20%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.80%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HISF

1D
0.11%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBI vs. HISF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTBI and HISF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

0.53

The correlation between FTBI and HISF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBI vs. HISF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBI
FTBI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HISF
HISF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HISF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HISF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBI vs. HISF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTBIHISFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.30

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.86

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

6.71

+8.63

FTBI vs. HISF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the HISF Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBI and HISF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTBIHISFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.63

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

1.32

+1.33

Drawdowns

FTBI vs. HISF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBI drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, which is greater than HISF's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBI and HISF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBIHISFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-3.86%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-2.90%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.09%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-0.89%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.80%

+0.37%

Volatility

FTBI vs. HISF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) at 1.21%. This indicates that FTBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBIHISFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.21%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

2.60%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.15%

3.32%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

3.95%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

3.95%

+3.18%

FTBI vs. HISF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HISF's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBI vs. HISF - Dividend Comparison

FTBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than HISF's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FTBI
First Trust Balanced Income ETF
7.87%4.76%0.00%
HISF
First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF
5.00%4.69%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBI and HISF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTBI has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to HISF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBI dropped -5.34% vs HISF's -3.86%.

On 1-year performance, FTBI leads with 17.93% vs 5.36% for HISF. On fees, HISF is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTBI has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HISF is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.

FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 5.00% for HISF.

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FTBI and 0.87% for HISF.

FTBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBI and HISF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer