FTBI vs. EAOK
FTBI (First Trust Balanced Income ETF) and EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. FTBI is actively managed, while EAOK is passively managed. Over the past year, FTBI returned 17.90% vs 12.25% for EAOK. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTBI charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOK.
Performance
FTBI vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTBI achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than EAOK's 3.85% return.
FTBI
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FTBI vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTBI First Trust Balanced Income ETF | 6.33% | 11.80% |
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.85% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTBI and EAOK is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FTBI and EAOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTBI vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank
FTBI
EAOK
FTBI vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTBI | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.78 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.31 | 12.14 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTBI | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.24 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.63 | 0.65 | +1.98 |
Drawdowns
FTBI vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTBI drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum EAOK drawdown of -19.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBI and EAOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTBI | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -19.91% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.34% | -4.43% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.39% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -5.02% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.01% | +0.16% |
Volatility
FTBI vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) have volatilities of 2.08% and 2.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTBI | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | 2.05% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | 4.48% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.17% | 5.49% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 7.04% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 6.83% | +0.31% |
FTBI vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTBI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOK's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTBI vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison
FTBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than EAOK's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
FTBI First Trust Balanced Income ETF | 7.89% | 4.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTBI and EAOK have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTBI has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to EAOK (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBI dropped -5.34% vs EAOK's -19.91%.
On 1-year performance, FTBI leads with 17.90% vs 12.25% for EAOK. On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTBI has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.
FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 3.17% for EAOK.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FTBI and 0.18% for EAOK.
FTBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTBI and EAOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer