PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBD vs. RYSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBD vs. RYSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBD achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than RYSE's 2.52% return.


FTBD

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.67%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
10Y*

RYSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.52%
6M
5.91%
1Y
1.55%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBD vs. RYSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTBD
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
0.99%8.35%1.77%3.30%
RYSE
Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
2.52%-3.09%12.46%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBD and RYSE is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2023

-0.79

The correlation between FTBD and RYSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBD vs. RYSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBD
FTBD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RYSE
RYSE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RYSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBD vs. RYSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTBDRYSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.04

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.19

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

0.40

+7.10

FTBD vs. RYSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the RYSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBD and RYSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTBDRYSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.15

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.42

+0.34

Drawdowns

FTBD vs. RYSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBD drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, smaller than the maximum RYSE drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBD and RYSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBDRYSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-19.70%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-8.06%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.56%

-19.70%

+13.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-7.83%

+6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-9.18%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

3.86%

-2.99%

Volatility

FTBD vs. RYSE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that FTBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBDRYSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

0.00%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

6.64%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

10.64%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

14.92%

-9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

14.92%

-9.05%

FTBD vs. RYSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RYSE's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBD vs. RYSE - Dividend Comparison

FTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than RYSE's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTBD
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
5.03%5.04%4.76%4.69%
RYSE
Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
1.37%1.86%2.58%24.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBD and RYSE have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTBD has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to RYSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBD dropped -6.98% vs RYSE's -19.70%.

On 3-year performance, FTBD leads with 5.08% vs 4.39% for RYSE. On fees, FTBD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, RYSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FTBD has performed better with a 5.08% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTBD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RYSE.

FTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 1.37% for RYSE.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FTBD and 0.85% for RYSE.

FTBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBD and RYSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer