PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAWX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAWX achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 18.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAWX has underperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 4.00%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.


FTAWX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.47%
YTD
4.30%
6M
4.62%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
4.00%

MHELX

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.02%
YTD
18.36%
6M
18.63%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A
4.30%9.07%5.05%7.66%-10.50%3.72%8.29%10.32%-1.96%4.98%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
18.36%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAWX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2005

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FTAWX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAWX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAWX
FTAWX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FTAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAWXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.38

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

4.48

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

15.16

-1.15

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAWX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAWXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.99

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.25

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.43

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.33

+0.51

Drawdowns

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAWX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAWX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAWXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-61.24%

+41.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-8.52%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

-30.81%

+25.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.13%

-32.01%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.13%

-39.02%

+24.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.70%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-12.93%

+10.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

2.51%

-1.74%

Volatility

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A (FTAWX) is 1.52%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that FTAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAWXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

4.70%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

15.30%

-11.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

19.28%

-15.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

21.01%

-15.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.66%

20.97%

-16.31%

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAWX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAWX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

FTAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than MHELX's 6.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% Fund Class A
2.78%2.82%3.07%2.85%4.23%1.33%1.85%2.72%3.78%1.69%1.59%3.64%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.10%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAWX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FTAWX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAWX dropped -19.82% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

FTAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAWX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer